14 thoughts on “Should violent video games be sold to minors without parental approval?

  1. Steven had really strong points and explained it very well. It seems that he had good control over the debate, however some points went on a little too long. Overall he had good rebuttals and explanations on the relations between crimes and video games.

    Like

  2. In the first video I believe Steven won because his confidence about his argument really helped to strengthen his point of view.

    Like

  3. Stevens attitude made me believe he won, because he made good points and took Zain’s points and turned them against him.

    Like

  4. Steven won because of his confidence, he had a lot of counterarguments. Steven was fighting for his spot up there which really helped him bring his points across. Really liked this debate but, Zain lost

    Like

  5. I would say that Steven won the debate because his points were both strong and clear. He also had some good counterarguments against what Zain was saying.

    Like

  6. Patrick won because he spoke clearly and he had good counter arguments. Three really strong points that made him won were that violent video games have nudity, terrorist like acts, and can make you lash out.

    Like

  7. I would like to think steven one, mostly because his reasoning was common sense and he also had his counter-attacks when Zain was stating something, he always was able to think of an answer and he was prepared

    Like

  8. I Believe that Patrick Williams has won over this debate. Because he had evidence to support his opinion and stuff and he had connections.Lastly he won because he had stronger words against Chris which made him win the debate.

    Like

  9. Steven was absolutely great he was strong and open minded he got his point across and Zain well he did great too he just needs to be a little more loose and confident about the point hes trying ti get across but other then that he did a good jib as well.

    Like

  10. The second video was very good in a way it gave reason why video game are good and bad Patrick showed how video game are like and how this could impact a child that is underage. Christopher brought out great point that video game are not the only factor but could also be a positive thing for children as well but at the end of the day Patrick won because he know what he was saying and even counter-attack Christopher when talk about GTA and there is nudity

    Like

  11. I think Steven won the debate because he explain his points on detail. He supported his points with facts. He know how to defend his side with facts.

    Like

  12. Steven won overall phenomenal debate one of my faveorite ones that I have watched but both men did such a great job made strong points, however Steven had awesome points to suport his side and he seemed very passionate about his topic props to both Sophomores they stole the show and had the best debate I’ve seen.

    Like

  13. We all clearly see that Patrick won this debate, He was countering on Christopher points, He fully stated on Christopher on the question that he was ask, and destroy his answer. Patrick brought huge points on the table which wipe out most of Christopher’s points and made Christopher took some pauses in the video.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s